
If there’s one thing that can be said about Sarah Palin, it’s that nobody really knows why she suddenly announced her resignation as Governor of Alaska with a full 18 months left in her first term except for her. Some have said it’s based on her intent to focus on running for the 2012 presidential election, although that seems a little premature. Mitt Romney, for instance, stepped down as governor of Massachusetts in February of 2007 in preparation for his shot at the Presidency. Mike Huckabee stepped down as Governor of Arkansas around the same time. By contrast, the proper time for Sarah Palin to focus on her run for the Presidency would be early 2011, long after her term would have ended in Alaska.
There have been many attributions to the media as being Sarah Palin’s reason for resignation. Conservative faithful say that she was hounded by them, harassed long after she stepped from the presidential spotlight, and made the brunt of constant jokes about her family from liberals. That part is true enough. Even as she announced her withdrawal from Alaskan politics to begin some new, ambiguous journey, her detractors derided her with time-tested jokes about her family.
But people are still clearly confused about why she chose to leave office, except that we know she said she has been motivated by a “higher calling”. In her resignation speech, she said that she didn’t want to spend the last 18 months of her term as a “lame duck” governor, saying that some politicians have a tendency to “milk it”, and that she didn’t want to cost the taxpayers of Alaska unnecessary money and expenses. Not to overstate the obvious, but it doesn’t make any sense to say with nearly half of her term left in office, that she would be merely coasting along as an ineffective leader. Indeed, many conservatives in America widely regarded her position as being one that still gave her the kind of credibility and authority needed to speak to issues of an important nature. Indeed, after watching the press conference, one is left wondering whether this is a Sarah Palin moving on to bigger and better, or preparing to fade to black.
If it is the latter hope, then former George W. Bush strategist Karl Rove is perplexed by the move. Calling it “risky”, he said that stepping down from office takes away a platform for controlling the agenda and message.
“The media, if she wants to run for president, is going to be following her for the next 3½ years,” said Rove, who called the move unclear and therefore a potentially harmful strategy for a politician. “Effective strategies in politics are ones that are so clear and obvious that people can grasp. … It’s not clear what she’s doing and why.”
Worse than the uncertainty of the reasons for her decision, it gives her opponents the opportunity to call her a “quitter”. Mike Huckabee also said that her resignation won’t end the media hounding. If the perception is that she was “chased” out of office, it will hurt her credibility for being able to hold on to a higher office. Meanwhile Republican strategist Ed Rollins also agrees that resigning does not automatically mean she’s headed for a 2012 run for office. Citing other governors who have aims at the White House, he said that the “lame duck” excuse doesn’t fly in conservative circles, and will damage her career. “She didn’t finish the job.”
“The new (Alaska) governor, the legislature will move right beyond her,” Rollins asserted, “and I think, to a certain extent, she certainly will have a voice among conservatives, as a viable, political person who’s gonna help the Republican party, (but) I don’t think she can do it as effectively if you’re not a governor.”
[...]
“Every step from here on out has to be one that has a strategy to it,” Rollins said. “This is tactical. She got up (Friday), went out, surprised the political world – which you shouldn’t do – surprised the media world – which you shouldn’t do – and at the end of the day, no one knows why. She’s gotta go answer all the questions and not run away from them: ‘Here’s why I did it, it was for my family, it was for this, and for that reason.’ But the idea, it’s speculation, ‘I’m gonna run for president, I can do it more effectively from outside,’ is not true.”
The fact is that when John McCain picked her for a running mate for 2008, she skyrocketed into the conservative spotlight, but has yet to earn the kind of accolades she’s received from her supporters. That she’s suffered undue scorn and hatred from her opponents, including attacks against her family, is certainly something that must have been difficult on her. The challenge then, is to be able to prove herself as someone able to rise above it all, and come out on top as a champion. Because the fact is that nobody respects a quitter.
Related
















July 5, 2009 at 4:04 pm
“That she’s suffered undue scorn and hatred from her opponents”
The problem for Palin is, that in this environment of media adolation for Obama her “opponents” seem to be 90% of the media. What politician would stick it out with that kind of animosity being focused against them?
I can’t wait to see how Obama shoulders media criticism when it finally arrives on his door step.
July 5, 2009 at 4:08 pm
Paul,
I think that day is soon arriving. Even his liberal allies are not pleased with his policies and changes from his promises. Then again, according to a recent article, Canadians still swoon and shiver when he speaks.
The media is fickle. When the tide turns against him, it’ll be difficult, no doubt.
July 5, 2009 at 6:12 pm
So what do you do, go deeply in debt defending yourself ($500,000 plus) from frivolous complaints unleashed by a group of haters or leave, take some time, study up, and come back to prove everybody wrong??
She may not have had a choice. The hateful left were determined to destroy her.
July 5, 2009 at 6:30 pm
“She may not have had a choice. The hateful left were determined to destroy her.”
I see we’re back to “It’s a commie plot” here.
July 5, 2009 at 6:35 pm
It’s a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy!
July 5, 2009 at 6:48 pm
“Mr. Parnell, who is scheduled to take over for Ms. Palin on July 26, said it was costing the State of Alaska about $2 million just to pay for the staff to deal with the records requests from the ethics complaints.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/us/06palin.html?ref=global-home
It looks to me that Palin felt she had become a liability to the State of Alaska and that her family paid too heavy price, financially and emotionally, for her political aspirations. Who among us would not quit as abruptly as she did under such circumstances?
July 5, 2009 at 6:55 pm
“it was costing the State of Alaska about $2 million just to pay for the staff to deal with the records requests from the ethics complaints.”
“Palin felt she had become a liability to the State of Alaska”
Hmmm…let me see. Two megabucks in a state budget of $40 gigabucks comes to five one-thousandths of a percent.
Yup, there’s a serious financial liability all right.
C’mon…
July 5, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Look Peter. There are more theories about why Palin resigned than there are stars in the milky way. Mine is as valid as the next one.
Stick to your commie plot line, I’ll stick to mine.
July 5, 2009 at 9:00 pm
@Louise M.
“There are more theories about why Palin resigned than there are stars in the milky way.”
Yes, there are. But that’s mostly as a result of an rambling, inarticulate resignation speech that didn’t say very much of anything. And that illustrates nicely one of the reasons she isn’t qualified for national office, since she can’t seem to clearly communicate her reasons.
The “commie plot” was posted tongue in cheek, btw. Reminds me of the good ol’ days, when Hollywood was packed with communists and homosexuals, and Senator Joe was rooting them out…
(Also posted tongue in cheek btw.)
July 5, 2009 at 10:00 pm
“I see we’re back to “It’s a commie plot” here.”
Well his supporters do lean that way, LOL. So why not?
July 5, 2009 at 10:01 pm
By “his” supporters, I mean O’s.
July 5, 2009 at 10:16 pm
“Well his supporters do lean that way, LOL. So why not?”
Here’s a sample of those “supporters” picking on Sarah:
http://rootswire.org/content/republican-reaction-sarah-palin-resignation
Liz Trotta is a commie? Who’d a thunk it?
Palin got in over her head, and is crying the victim blues. There just isn’t anything more to the story. Yes, the media has had a field day with some of her gaffes, and yes, there have been some inappropriate comments made by the knuckleheads on both sides of the political spectrum. That’s just the nature of the beast. It doesn’t add up to a “commie plot” (or even a liberal bias) any more than Arnie’s campaign for governor of Califaornia added up to a “facist plot” (or even a right wing bias). I won’t even get into Regan’s campaign here…